Mathematics, in pictures.

Some mathematical ideas are hard because they are genuinely hard. Others are hard only because nobody drew them properly. This is a collection of essays about the second kind — one idea at a time, illustrated to the point where the argument becomes visible.

Pascal's triangle mod 2, 32 rows. Only the odd entries are drawn; the pattern that appears is the Sierpiński triangle. — Fig. 1 Pascal’s triangle with the odd numbers shaded and the even ones left blank. Nothing here was designed to make a pattern; the pattern is a consequence of the arithmetic. See Pascal’s triangle, two colours.

Recently added

22 essays, 14 September 2026 — everything that has been added, in order

The 6 ways to deal 4 labels between pieces of size 2 and 2. Every way of splitting 4 labels between a piece of size 2 and a piece of size 2, listed as two rows of boxes each. The count is the binomial coefficient that distinguishes a labelled product from an ordinary one.

Discrete

The product that deals the labels

Multiplying two counting series pairs one choice with another. When the things being counted carry labels, the labels have to be dealt out as well, and the only series that survive the extra bookkeeping are the ones divided by n factorial.

7 figures

Permutations of n things, by how many pairs they put in the wrong order. A table whose row n and column k hold the number of permutations of size n whose inversions is k, with each row's total beside it — the plain count the one-variable series gives.

Discrete

The coefficient that is a polynomial

Add a second variable to track a statistic and each coefficient stops being a number. Set the new variable to one and the old count comes back untouched; leave it in and the mean of the statistic is a derivative rather than an average.

8 figures

The powers of 2 modulo 13, as a ring of 12. The non-zero residues modulo 13 placed on a circle, with the successive powers of 2 joined by straight lines into a closed walk of 12 steps.

Number

One residue whose powers are all of them

Fermat's theorem says every order divides p − 1. It does not say that anything has order exactly p − 1, which is a separate and stronger claim — and what forces it is a count of how many numbers share each divisor with p − 1.

7 figures

The orders of the 8 units modulo 15. A strip of the units modulo 15 with each one's multiplicative order beneath it, the largest order marked at 4 against φ(15) = 8.

Number

The exponent that is smaller than Euler's

Euler's theorem raises every unit to the count of the units and gets one. The smallest exponent that works for all of them at once is often much smaller — and a composite is invisible to Fermat's test exactly when that smaller number divides n − 1.

8 figures

Five certificates against any two of three decide. A table of every minimal balanced family on three players, what each demands of the game, and whether the grand coalition's value covers it — the complete test for whether a stable split exists.

Applied

Five weighings and the question is closed

Searching the triangle of splits can only ever fail to find a stable one, which is not the same as there being none. Weighing five families of coalitions against the whole settles the question outright — and the family that fails is the proof that nothing survives.

7 figures

The splits of any two of three decide that nobody can out-argue. The triangle of all splits of a joint gain, with the splits marked at which every player's loudest complaint against every other is matched by an equally loud complaint back.

Applied

An objection one player makes to another

The core lets a coalition object to everybody at once. Narrow it to one player objecting to one other, require every such objection to be met by an equally loud one coming back, and exactly one split survives — with no dictionary order anywhere in the argument.

7 figures

Start anywhere

Eight of 495 essays — the whole collection is a click away, or search it.

The Pythagorean theorem by dissection. Two squares of the same size. Each holds four copies of one right triangle. The space left over is a single tilted square on the left and two upright squares on the right.

Geometry

Two squares, four triangles, and no algebra

The Pythagorean theorem is usually met as a formula to be memorised. It is much better met as a rearrangement that can be checked by eye.

7 figures

Odd numbers as square shells. Nested L-shaped shells of 1, 3, 5 … 11 cells stack into a 6 by 6 square.

Geometry

Every square is a stack of odd numbers

Add up the odd numbers in order and the running totals are 1, 4, 9, 16, 25. This is not a coincidence, and the reason fits in a single picture.

7 figures

Euclid's algorithm on a 34 by 13 rectangle. The rectangle is tiled by peeling off the largest square that fits, again and again, until nothing is left.

Geometry

The oldest algorithm, drawn as a tiling

Euclid's method for finding a greatest common divisor is usually presented as a loop. It is also a way of tiling a rectangle with squares, and the tiling explains why it works.

7 figures

The five Platonic solids. Tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, dodecahedron and icosahedron, drawn at a common scale.

Geometry

Why the list of perfect solids stops at five

There are infinitely many regular polygons and exactly five regular solids. The reason is not deep, but it is very sharp, and it can be checked on a single row of corners.

8 figures

Four conic sections from one cone. Circle, ellipse, parabola and hyperbola, produced by tilting a single cutting plane further and further.

Geometry

One cone, four curves

The circle, the ellipse, the parabola and the hyperbola look like four separate objects with four separate equations. They are one object, cut at four angles.

6 figures

A circle unrolled into a sine wave. On the left a radius turns through an angle; on the right the height of its tip is plotted against the angle, tracing a sine curve.

Analysis

A sine wave is a circle seen from the side

Sine is introduced as a ratio in a right triangle, which is true and explains nothing about why its graph is a wave. There is a better picture.

7 figures

8 rectangles under a curve. A left-endpoint Riemann sum with 8 rectangles approximating the area under a curve.

Analysis

Adding up rectangles until they stop being rectangles

The integral is defined as a limit of sums of rectangles. The definition is exact, the picture is honest about what it costs, and the gap between them is the whole subject.

7 figures

Partial sums of the square wave. Approximations using 1, 3, 7, 21 terms; the corners sharpen but a fixed overshoot remains.

Analysis

A square wave built entirely out of round ones

Add enough sine waves together and flat tops and vertical cliffs appear from nothing. Almost — there is a 9% overshoot that never goes away, and it is not a bug.

7 figures