Mathematics, in pictures.
Some mathematical ideas are hard because they are genuinely hard. Others are hard only because nobody drew them properly. This is a collection of essays about the second kind — one idea at a time, illustrated to the point where the argument becomes visible.
Recently added
15 essays, 14 August 2026, opening up logic — everything that has been added, in order
A formula is a corner of a cube
A formula about three letters is a set of eight rows. Written as a table that is a list; drawn on a cube it is a shape — and the shape is what almost every later question in this field turns out to be about.
LogicOne connective is enough
Of the sixteen ways to combine two truth values, exactly two can build all the others by themselves. Which two is not obvious, and the reason turns out to be five properties that a connective either has or escapes.
LogicThe map that puts neighbours side by side
Reorder the rows of a truth table so that neighbouring squares differ in one letter, and finding a short formula stops being algebra and becomes the problem of covering a shape with rectangles.
LogicFour circles cannot do it
Three overlapping circles cut the plane into exactly the eight regions three sets need. Four circles cut it into fourteen, and sixteen are required — so the diagram everyone draws stops working at four, and the reason is a count.
LogicTwenty-four out of two hundred and fifty-six
Aristotle's syllogisms are four sentence forms in four arrangements, which makes 256 patterns of argument. Fifteen of them are valid. Nine more become valid if you assume the things being talked about exist, and the gap between those numbers is a two-thousand-year-old disagreement.
LogicEvery row, or one column
For every person there is someone who loves them, and there is someone who loves everyone, are the same six words in a different order. Draw the relation as a grid and they become two obviously different questions — one about rows, one about columns.
Start anywhere
Twelve of 90 essays — the whole collection is a click away, or search it.
Two squares, four triangles, and no algebra
The Pythagorean theorem is usually met as a formula to be memorised. It is much better met as a rearrangement that can be checked by eye.
GeometryEvery square is a stack of odd numbers
Add up the odd numbers in order and the running totals are 1, 4, 9, 16, 25. This is not a coincidence, and the reason fits in a single picture.
GeometryThe oldest algorithm, drawn as a tiling
Euclid's method for finding a greatest common divisor is usually presented as a loop. It is also a way of tiling a rectangle with squares, and the tiling explains why it works.
GeometryWhy the list of perfect solids stops at five
There are infinitely many regular polygons and exactly five regular solids. The reason is not deep, but it is very sharp, and it can be checked on a single row of corners.
GeometryOne cone, four curves
The circle, the ellipse, the parabola and the hyperbola look like four separate objects with four separate equations. They are one object, cut at four angles.
AnalysisA sine wave is a circle seen from the side
Sine is introduced as a ratio in a right triangle, which is true and explains nothing about why its graph is a wave. There is a better picture.
AnalysisAdding up rectangles until they stop being rectangles
The integral is defined as a limit of sums of rectangles. The definition is exact, the picture is honest about what it costs, and the gap between them is the whole subject.
AnalysisA square wave built entirely out of round ones
Add enough sine waves together and flat tops and vertical cliffs appear from nothing. Almost — there is a 9% overshoot that never goes away, and it is not a bug.
AnalysisThe curve that is its own slope
There is exactly one shape of exponential curve whose steepness at every point equals its height at that point. The number that produces it is 2.71828…, and it was not chosen for elegance.
AlgebraA matrix is a picture of what happens to the grid
Four numbers in a box is not an object anyone has intuitions about. The same four numbers, shown as an instruction for redrawing the plane, are.
AlgebraMultiplying is turning
Complex numbers are introduced as an algebraic dodge for square roots of negatives. They are better understood as the arithmetic of rotation, at which point every rule stops needing to be remembered.
DiscreteSeven bridges, and the invention of throwing things away
Euler solved a puzzle about a Prussian city by deleting the city. What survived the deletion was a new branch of mathematics.
All 90 essays · by ladder · by named object · what the figures prove
Threads running through
themes, not categories
Proof without words
Arguments that are complete once they have been looked at properly. Not illustrations of proofs — the proofs themselves.
Pi turns up uninvited
A constant defined by circles, appearing in places with no circle anywhere in sight, and what that tends to mean.
Doing infinitely many things
Sums that never end, subdivisions that never stop, and the care required to make either of them mean something.
The same thing twice
Two constructions that look unrelated and turn out to be the same object wearing different clothes.
Throwing things away
Progress made by deleting detail: the map that becomes a graph, the shape that becomes a number.
Order out of noise
Random processes that reliably produce the same shape, and the reason that is less mysterious than it looks.
One point away
Constructions that work perfectly except at a single exceptional place, and what is done about it.
Things that cannot be done
Results that close a door rather than open one — and the peculiar difficulty of drawing a picture of something that does not exist.
Counting the same thing twice
One collection, counted by two different methods, and an identity that falls out because both answers have to agree. The proof is the pair of counts.
Sensitive to everything
Systems where a difference too small to draw becomes the whole difference, and the reason that is a property of the rule rather than of the measurement.
Small rules, large behaviour
Rules short enough to write on one line, producing behaviour nobody can summarise — and the finding that the size of a rule predicts nothing about the difficulty of the questions it raises.
What a system cannot say
Rules asked a question about themselves, and an answer that is provably not available from inside — which is a different kind of limit from not knowing yet.
Decided by exhaustion
Questions with finitely many cases, settled by going through all of them — and what changes when a claim about every argument becomes a count.
Small cases lie
Patterns that hold for every example anyone would check by hand, and then stop. The cases within reach are not a sample of the cases.