Mathematics, in pictures.

Some mathematical ideas are hard because they are genuinely hard. Others are hard only because nobody drew them properly. This is a collection of essays about the second kind — one idea at a time, illustrated to the point where the argument becomes visible.

Pascal's triangle mod 2, 32 rows. Only the odd entries are drawn; the pattern that appears is the Sierpiński triangle. — Fig. 1 Pascal’s triangle with the odd numbers shaded and the even ones left blank. Nothing here was designed to make a pattern; the pattern is a consequence of the arithmetic. See Pascal’s triangle, two colours.

Recently added

50 essays, 5 September 2026 — everything that has been added, in order

The triangulation as the underside of a hull. Eight points on a floor, lifted onto a paraboloid above them. The faces of the lifted set's lower convex hull are shaded, and their shadows on the floor are the Delaunay triangulation of the original points.

Geometry

One dimension up, and the circles disappear

The Delaunay triangulation is defined by a condition about circles, which is awkward to compute and awkward to reason about. Lift every point onto a paraboloid and the circles turn into planes, the condition turns into convexity, and a two-dimensional problem is solved by looking at a three-dimensional shape from underneath.

6 figures

A scatter walking towards its own centres. 4 panels of the same 24 sites: the initial clumpy scatter and the Voronoi diagram after 1, 3, 12 rounds of Lloyd's iteration, with the cost falling to 52% of the scatter's as the cells even out.

Geometry

Every site in the middle of its own cell

Move each point to the centre of mass of its own Voronoi cell, then redraw the diagram, then do it again. The rule is two lines long, it never mentions hexagons, and what it settles into is a honeycomb.

6 figures

Geometry

When the sites are not the same size

Give every site a weight and the boundaries slide. The cells stay convex and the edges stay straight, which is surprising, and one thing happens that the unweighted diagram never allows — a site can end up owning nothing at all.

6 figures

The shortest tree was already in the triangulation. The Delaunay triangulation of 20 sites in faint lines with the minimum spanning tree drawn over it in heavy ones. Every tree edge is a triangulation edge, and the circles on the longest few tree edges as diameters contain no other site.

Geometry

The tree inside the triangulation

The shortest network joining a set of points is built from edges chosen by length, and the triangulation is built from edges chosen by an emptiness condition about circles. The two constructions share no step, and every edge of the first is an edge of the second.

6 figures

The two numbers that make up a width. A Reuleaux polygon with 3 sides, its centre marked as the origin, and the two supporting lines with normals 33° and 213°. The perpendicular distances from the origin to the two lines are marked; they add to the width.

Geometry

The shape described from outside

A convex shape can be given by its boundary or by the family of lines that touch it, and the second description turns the constant-width condition into one line of arithmetic — after which the perimeter falls out, and curves with no corners at all can simply be written down.

6 figures

A bad path, and the path it reflects to. Two grids, 6 by 5. On the left a monotone path that dips below the diagonal, with its first offending step marked; on the right the same path with everything after that step reflected, which ends one square right and one square below the corner.

Discrete

Counting the paths that go wrong

The number of good paths across a grid has no obvious formula. The number of bad ones does, because every bad path can be reflected into a path to a different corner, and that reflection is a perfect matching between two sets nobody chose to relate.

6 figures

Start anywhere

Eight of 375 essays — the whole collection is a click away, or search it.

The Pythagorean theorem by dissection. Two squares of the same size. Each holds four copies of one right triangle. The space left over is a single tilted square on the left and two upright squares on the right.

Geometry

Two squares, four triangles, and no algebra

The Pythagorean theorem is usually met as a formula to be memorised. It is much better met as a rearrangement that can be checked by eye.

7 figures

Odd numbers as square shells. Nested L-shaped shells of 1, 3, 5 … 11 cells stack into a 6 by 6 square.

Geometry

Every square is a stack of odd numbers

Add up the odd numbers in order and the running totals are 1, 4, 9, 16, 25. This is not a coincidence, and the reason fits in a single picture.

7 figures

Euclid's algorithm on a 34 by 13 rectangle. The rectangle is tiled by peeling off the largest square that fits, again and again, until nothing is left.

Geometry

The oldest algorithm, drawn as a tiling

Euclid's method for finding a greatest common divisor is usually presented as a loop. It is also a way of tiling a rectangle with squares, and the tiling explains why it works.

7 figures

The five Platonic solids. Tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, dodecahedron and icosahedron, drawn at a common scale.

Geometry

Why the list of perfect solids stops at five

There are infinitely many regular polygons and exactly five regular solids. The reason is not deep, but it is very sharp, and it can be checked on a single row of corners.

8 figures

Four conic sections from one cone. Circle, ellipse, parabola and hyperbola, produced by tilting a single cutting plane further and further.

Geometry

One cone, four curves

The circle, the ellipse, the parabola and the hyperbola look like four separate objects with four separate equations. They are one object, cut at four angles.

6 figures

A circle unrolled into a sine wave. On the left a radius turns through an angle; on the right the height of its tip is plotted against the angle, tracing a sine curve.

Analysis

A sine wave is a circle seen from the side

Sine is introduced as a ratio in a right triangle, which is true and explains nothing about why its graph is a wave. There is a better picture.

7 figures

8 rectangles under a curve. A left-endpoint Riemann sum with 8 rectangles approximating the area under a curve.

Analysis

Adding up rectangles until they stop being rectangles

The integral is defined as a limit of sums of rectangles. The definition is exact, the picture is honest about what it costs, and the gap between them is the whole subject.

7 figures

Partial sums of the square wave. Approximations using 1, 3, 7, 21 terms; the corners sharpen but a fixed overshoot remains.

Analysis

A square wave built entirely out of round ones

Add enough sine waves together and flat tops and vertical cliffs appear from nothing. Almost — there is a 9% overshoot that never goes away, and it is not a bug.

7 figures